Ai Agents 3 min read

Agent Search Queries Leak Private Data in MosaicLeaks Study

Researchers from ServiceNow AI and the University of Edinburgh found that deep-research AI agents leak sensitive internal data through external search logs.

On June 18, 2026, researchers from ServiceNow AI and the University of Edinburgh published MosaicLeaks, a benchmark and research paper detailing how deep-research AI agents leak sensitive data through external web search queries. The study identifies a “mosaic effect” where an adversary can reconstruct private enterprise information solely by observing the aggregate logs of an agent’s search tool usage. For developers building systems that interleave internal documents with public data, this exposes a structural vulnerability in standard agentic search behavior.

The Capable-but-Leaky Paradox

The research isolates a failure mode in agents that synthesize private context with external web search. A single query to a search API might appear benign. An aggregate log of these queries allows adversaries to infer sensitive data without accessing the source documents or the agent’s internal reasoning.

The study categorizes this vulnerability into three severity tiers. Intent leakage reveals the private research goals the agent is pursuing. Answer leakage uses the query logs to answer specific internal questions. Full-information leakage occurs when the cumulative log states verifiably true private claims.

Models optimized strictly for task accuracy exacerbate this vulnerability. As agents improve at connecting disparate documents, they tend to include more private context in their search parameters to yield better external results. The researchers found that standard zero-shot privacy prompting reduces but fails to eliminate the risk.

Benchmark Performance Evaluation

The researchers introduced a benchmark of 1,001 multi-hop deep research tasks to measure this tradeoff. They evaluated standard reinforcement learning for task performance against their proposed Privacy-Aware Deep Research (PA-DR) framework. PA-DR applies a learned privacy classifier to provide dense credit assignment for privacy violations during the training process.

Testing on Qwen3-4B-Instruct, the PA-DR framework improved task success while cutting the leakage rate by more than two-thirds.

Training MethodStrict Chain Success RateLeakage Rate
Standard RL (Baseline)48.7%34.0%
Privacy-Aware Deep Research58.7%9.9%

The performance gains in PA-DR indicate that models can learn to abstract their external queries effectively if privacy constraints are embedded directly into the training loop. This aligns with broader challenges in evaluating and testing AI agents across multi-step execution environments.

Enterprise Data Security Context

The release of MosaicLeaks follows a separate security incident involving ServiceNow earlier in June 2026. A misconfigured API endpoint on the company’s Australia platform release granted unauthenticated access to customer instances. While ServiceNow confirmed the activity originated primarily from bug-bounty researchers rather than malicious actors, the event highlighted the rigid security requirements for enterprise data platforms.

If you manage enterprise retrieval-augmented generation pipelines, you must evaluate how your models formulate external search API calls. Top-level guardrails and system prompts are insufficient for preventing data extraction through search logs. Implement privacy-aware credit assignment during post-training alignment to ensure agents sanitize their external tool usage before execution.

Get Insanely Good at AI

Get Insanely Good at AI

The book for developers who want to understand how AI actually works. LLMs, prompt engineering, RAG, AI agents, and production systems.

Keep Reading